Three practices, one delivery process.
They are separate teams because the disciplines genuinely differ, and one organization because the failures we get called in to fix live in the gaps between suppliers. Work crosses the boundary internally, not through a subcontract.
Large systems, architecture, custom development, integrations, legacy modernization, DevOps and infrastructure. The oldest practice in the group and the one behind our longest-running engagements — the work measured in years rather than in sprints.
- Custom internal applications and portals
- ERP, CRM and WMS integration
- Legacy modernization and gradual replacement
- Cloud, DevOps and long-term maintenance
AI agents and custom LLM systems put into live operations. The engineers are forward-deployed: they sit with your process owners and watch the work happen instead of building from a specification document that was already out of date when it was written.
- Agents in production, with governance
- Document extraction and knowledge retrieval
- Agentic layers over an existing ERP
- Data pipelines and retrieval infrastructure
The interface layer on top of what the other two teams build: the screens people actually work in. Product and front-end, from an MVP to something that survives real use — and on larger engagements it borrows capacity from Enter Tech rather than pretending five people can do everything.
- Internal apps and portals people use daily
- The screens on top of an agent or an automation
- Product work from MVP to scale
- Design systems and component libraries
Three practices. One team.
Software engineering, AI and the product interface work inside one delivery process. Whichever of the three does the work, the engagement has one contract, one delivery lead and one escalation path.
The contracting party is AI Enter s.r.o., trading as EnterIT. That is the name on the proposal, on the contract and on the invoice.
Permanent practices, not a network assembled per project.
Software engineering, AI and agents, product — staffed permanently, not assembled per project.
That is the whole argument for a team this size rather than a bigger one. Large enough to hold three disciplines permanently; small enough that the person accountable for your engagement answers their own phone.
Talk to us →Bruntál and Prague, working with teams across Europe and in the US.
Discovery and the early process mapping are worth doing in the room. Almost everything after that is better done asynchronously, with a written status waiting when your day starts.
You ship to production and then you keep it running — which is a different job, and the one worth having.
Open roles →